Overall Rating: 5
4 out of 7 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| June 20, 2014 |
| Samuel W. - San Francisco, CA |
|
Another reviewer mentions htat this is titanium. It is not. It is Tungsten, which is heavier. I've had this ring for 6 years, and there is absolutely no sign of wear. Not a scratch, not a blemish. You should know that the matte finish on the design is mildly abrasive. I use it to polish my fingernails. But being made of tungsten it will scratch finished surfaces and glass, so you have to be a little careful what you glide your hand over when you are wearing this ring. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
6 out of 17 people found the following review helpful:
Rating:  |
| February 20, 2011 |
| Aiden E. - Shreveport, LA |
|
Nice ring but less gold than I thought but for the list price, a definite steal. 14k simple wedding bands go for over 200 easy at the locations I've seen. With the detailing and the gold, a real good buy like other reviewers said. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
5 out of 7 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| August 05, 2013 |
| Claude B. - Winnipeg, MB |
|
It's a great ring, cheaper than other Benchmarks I saw in a store -- simple and classic, just the way I like it. I did have to use the lifetime warranty and got it replaced no problem. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
9 out of 11 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| August 27, 2013 |
| Alison R. - Weilerbach, Rheinland-Pfalz |
|
Wow, the pictures do not do this ring justice. This is a very bright ring, with a lighter tone of gold than expected, but it looks GREAT. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
0 out of 0 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| March 01, 2011 |
| Randolph A B. - Mount Airy, MD |
|
Weight was off a size 6.5 weighed 5g's even the said this ring was6.2 minimum |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
